Question not identified.

No question identified. : P | 7 . I. Questey Pesented In plan bargains, prosecutors usually Agree to reduce A detendhrts portend hy Ploy nctonp Uh tks by reducing the wiihber oF «Charges, Whew A dlefeuctwt take A plea Lar gain, 14 is ty eusue ho gets the best deal possible. , What is nother word for Plan -Bargaing Compromise Lowtract, | Wegotinte came to AW Agreement, Cop A oleADo A dleal, Plena! guilty get Of on A techwicality, | Heve area how of He Advawtages for criminal albenapnds who accept 4 plea arg Lighter sentence, Reduced charge, ThE case > 8 Over; Ayoiding problems with Prosecution, Accorching tothe LAW of te Uyfhed States Loustituton, He FY, | Anewelnewt state's, yo person shall be subject for the Awe offeyse to be twice put W jeopardy of Mife or hinbs wor shall be compelléel woe MWY criminal ese to bea wityess AGAINST hinself | United States Coushtuhoy, Amenanent MV: Af ‘persons Lorn ov nbturaloe,] | in He United Stree, ayd fubject fo the jurisdiction thereok aye citizens of the United States ano) of Hoo shhe Viheréin Hey resiol. No Stabe ska/| Make orentare Any law which shalf Abrighe the privileges ov immuntbice of citizens of He iptted States; nor shall any State debive ay PEON or li, Nberly or property, without. ale process LF, lane hr clay by AM PELOW Within’ Hs furisalictow He pwn protechin of fe hws, ; According to “LOUSWA STATE LEGISLATURE geri LE say)" y) . . ) JURISDICTION , [{ ] For cases from federal courts: The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case Was : [ ] No petition for rehearing was timely filed in my case. [ ] A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of Appeals on the following date: _, and a copy of the order denying rehearing appears at