No. 24-5209
Charles S. Renchenski v. Frederic J. Ammerman, Judge, Court of Common Pleas of Pennsylvania, Clearfield County
IFP
Tags: due-process impartiality objective-bias public-confidence constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-courts judicial-bias third-circuit
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Has the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and the Western District Court for Pennsylvania entered a decision that is in direct conflict with the United States Supreme Court resulting in equal-protection
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW : , 1. HAS THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, AS WELL AS THE WESTERN DISTRICT COURT FOR PENNSYLVANIA, ENTERED A DECISION THAT IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RESULTING IN EQUAL PROTECTION AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW BEING DENIED MR. RENCHENSKI VIA OBJECTIVE BIAS THAT ERODES THE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE IMPARTIALITY OF THE FEDERAL COURTS.
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 3, 2024)