No. 24-5213

Gilbert Campa v. Ingrid Rosenquist, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-08-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeals civil-action civil-procedure court-of-appeals dismissal holidays judicial-procedure jurisdiction legal-review prejudice procedural-error time-limits
Latest Conference: 2024-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Di e Ninth Circurr Cour of Aopeal , ASMISS) Yo my Civil Action Complaint for cor sicdoring a Temssiy epee. | respiring back 40 the Federal Court As being thok the bon Neon an MIG Time Limit Jo respond back on the Order +o ay g& al Court Judge Susan P Wators. See @ix-Bon I) totsr nr 4 Fudge San iitos Order to oe hipee Complain). a “Did she Ninth Circuit Cour+ o A . there was w Holiday even \n the worth of Solan Sot eating the 7 Dey. As Holidays ore never included anyfime with Time Limite mt Someone whore. Filing an Kind of 4 j j vo THING ny in Appet| or Motion with any Cour 3). Did She Ninth Ciréury Court of A Is err Ww yvot ing th 4 consideration, that how if whon venlin y hat Yaking th into even being Prejudiciol of all to dhe Roth ie ay lore» how that is not

Docket Entries

2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 3, 2024)

Attorneys

Gilbert Campa
Gilbert Campa — Petitioner
Gilbert Campa — Petitioner