Question not identified

estions Presented lor Rev: ew a Fable of Authorities Cited Y OPin ions Below 7 Jurisdiction g Reloted Cases 4 Stotement of the Case 10 Regons for Granting jurit of Certioracr 12 Cone lusion i9 ConstituHonnl ond Stotutery Revisions Tnvolved 2! Index to ApPendices APeendix Bi Tre) Court Record MPPendix AW Court of Criminal APPeols Record LPPend ix B: Vennessee Supreme Court Record Table of Asthorit ee) Cited Caik-Swape ¥. Swope, S23 S.W.3d ab 87 Cfean. cf bee. 2016) Bean v. Bailey ,2805.W. 34 798, $05 (enn. 2909) State ve Muslin, $7 SW. 3d 447, AT (ean. 001) © Shake Peaguson,2 SME 3d HL 415 Tenn. 1144) Beady v. Menylend, 375 W.5. 85, 83 9.Cf. 19410 Led Ad 115 (1465) Stabe v. Walker 410 5.0. 2d 561,389 Cann. (195) Stabe v Copeland, 485 Sil. 2d 105,106 Tenn. Cairn. App. 1993) WS.y Bagley 415 1.5,G6T, 41, 105 5.¢f. 5615, 97 Led. 24 461 (19¥5) sheleve Sees so. M1011 -otleCl A3CO Cann. Cain. Sop. 2020) | State v-Kelso, 2OL0 Wh 1109530 (Tenn. Cain. App. O20) Shale veleher Mb LOLO WL 445795 Cann. Cain. bpp. 40K0) Nanleyv. Safe, SSL D4, $4 $00 (Tenn. L018) Barter v. Rose, 513 Shh. Ld 930, 436 (Tenn. 1475) Shuchland v. Kashington, 466 15. 66%, 695, 104 S.C. 2052, 2067-69, 80 L.Ed. 2d G4 C04) Grovely v.Mils, $1 F.3d 114, 185 (64 Cum. (994) Lifckyv. US. 510 U.S. 540,590,114 5.4. 1147, 154,127 L.Ed. Ad Ad (asa) [dems v. JUS. ex tel. McCann, SIT 1.5. Rod, 280, 03 5.44. 236, GT L.Ed. L038 (1942) Spottoad v. Rose, 145 Tenn. 583, 604, 137 S.W. 6¥, 16 (922) Sfale v. RedSiguex , 254 S.W. 3d 3G(, 371 (Tenn. 2008) | Stete Vv. este. SAA SK). 3d af 30 (Tenn. 1010) State v. Small, 489 9.10. 2d G1, 673 (Tenn. 1999) Sith v. Stet, 357 S.W. 3d of 358. 4 | Halland Hloride, 560.16.5.631—(50 S.C}. 2544, WOR ITI L.Zd.. 15D) Dales v. Sfete 2023 WE 18001280 CTenn.Carin: bee 015) ee a Stew Laws 5 235 Swed at [4 Clann 2007) eee een ote v Rosie, 104 5. 34112, 178 Tein, L009) Stabe ne nn Teh Sd (5 20f i TO BG BLOF) co hn dad States Sup Ch Rule lO i Men Ra fag Pe BQ) wT App PAO) Than Re bye Oe Hea) Toon Ra hpo.P.. iM eneaeet went nn onanennnane Tenn Cairn: P.3 {) a ne oe ee oe ean. K. Cain. O. 53. ent ee me _ Tenn R.Crim.?. 36 A a). ee nn enon ete ee _Jean RR, Cain P. Sol oh) ee eee ennai cone Toon. ot Cai mop. Rule 106). ee ene pon Re Kid LOB) Tenn. Sua Ch. Risle 8, RPC 34-cy) ae Tenn. Op. Ch. Rule g, RPC 3.8 a) Tenn. se Rule t, RPC 3.3 d) . . Tenn-Sup. Ch. Risle 2 (PceA) Tenn. Sup. Ct Rule 10, RIC 2-11 (A) Cossfdadions: 3.0. f. Const. of TL See, Clause 3. Const. frnend WL T.C.h. Const. Pat. | See. TC. ft. Cons. ed. [ Sec (Ch. Const. ut WE Sec. | , 6 Te The , . Oupeeme Couset of The nited Hates Petition You kleit OF Certioegei Pelitiones cespect lly preys thel a ie df Contionae’ issse to Review) the jadgen act below. OPINTONS BELOK! Tor Cases fear stale Coeds: e The OPI KOK of the highest stale count to Revi Un dhe m anits Appeaks a hopexdix K t, the petition and is unpublished. The Opinion of dhe Tenn. Ceim. ho. Comet Opp Vans of Nopendix 6 to the petition and is xnoublished at LORS WL 296 2280 Turisdiction fox CaSe5 trom State Couets : Tha dete OK iihick tha highest state comet decided my Cease Was pail IC, 2025. h copy ol the decision Sppeaas at hop ondix 6. hs no petition fon aeheae Was filed. The juaisdichion of this Corset is invoked inden 8 MSA. KIT) and KSC. fh. Cons}. het I, Sec. L, Clause 2. hi pacties SPP rsh i the caption of the Case On the Cover page. Related Cases State v. Sales jrlo. MAOM O16 CeA-R3-C1, 1020 WL S56 %6X Chan. Crim, hop. Sapl. 7, 1620). parm. app. dani ad (Tear. hug. 4, 2021) State v. Kelso, L020 WL 2104830, af ¥5 (Tenn. Caim. pp. 2020) Stabe. fletcher, LOO WL 995795, f ¥5 (Tenn. Caim. fro. 4020) Sales v. Sate No M2O22OLL4O cA R3-PC, 2023 WE . 1461250 FTennCaim. Kop. pa IT, 2023) q | Sate nex of ( aoe Or feb. IT, LIT The pilioner wes Towed guilty of ins! degnee tue ee (54-15-20() by wey of a Rey veadicf ; Jena. R.Caim.P. Slag}. On ben 4, LOT. The pelfronen was sentenced doa tegen of de . imparsoamant by the daa Ch nd @ (ee oe A.