No. 24-5227
James W. Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process impartial-jury impartiality jury-selection peremptory-challenge racial-bias sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal defendant is denied his Due Process and Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury when the trial court determines that a potential juror who expresses an awareness that race can unconsciously affect perception and decisionmaking demonstrates partiality and must be excused for cause.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether a criminal defendant is denied his Due Process and Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury when the trial court determines that a potential juror who expresses an awareness that race can unconsciously affect perception and decisionmaking demonstrates partiality and must be excused for cause. i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-08
Waiver of United States of America of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2024-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2024)
2024-06-28
Application (23A1149) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until August 10, 2024.
2024-06-20
Application (23A1149) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 10, 2024 to September 8, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
James Johnson
Renee Domenique Pietropaolo — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Renee Domenique Pietropaolo — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent