No. 24-5235
Nohmaan Malik v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: ambiguity anders anders-procedure appellate-review circuit-split due-process guideline-commentary kisor kisor-standard
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appellate court should have dismissed under Anders and allowed Petitioner to challenge the Guideline commentary as violating due process and was ambiguous under the lesser deferential standard in Kisor based on a split in the circuits
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED ; Whether the appellate court should ; not have dismissed under Anders and allowed Petitioner to challénge the Guideline commentary as violating due process and was ambiguous under the lesser deferential standard in . Kisor based on a split in the circuits
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-09
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2024)
Attorneys
Nohmaan Malik
Nohmaan Malik — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent