John C. Coleman v. Michael Swartz, Warden
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Why was COLEMAN denied equal protection of law?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 4) | Why Wad COLEMAN denied equal Provection of law? oO : ~~ 2) Nas \vere a Vundamental deveck in COLEMAN'S Case whide inherently resulted ng complete miscarrioge of SKee OF AN OMIsSion INConsistent with Ye Cudimentrary demands of Voir Procedure ? > Did COLEMAN'S rial constitute a denial of Sundamentel Yaeness @ ; | UW) Was’ Covemand convicted of crimes ‘in a trial 39 untaic Ynak 4 could nok be called “due Process" of aus F 5) Was Coueman's tel and appeal counsel's deficient . Performance Yne “cause” Cor his claims not Properly being Presented wn Loe Stake Courts resulting “prejudice”: whicly lead to Vne claimed Procedural defaults? , bb) Was ne destrucion oy exculpatory evidence and the . withheld impeaching evidence Woy the Stake considered a . Brady Niclodion’ in COuEMAN'S Cage 2 os TV) Was Coueman’'s right Yo a speedy Artal Niclaked 2 BY) Was Were aullscienk evidence Supporting COLEMAN'S Conwiekion 4 Q) Wos Ynere o Brady Violotion Coremans case @ td) Why wasnt COLEMAN ® Actual \nnocence / Miscarriage oy Justice Claim was nok considered) by Mne Districk and Appeals Cows? |