No. 24-5240
Bradley Dale Hull v. United States
Tags: federal-rules-of-evidence intent intent-element lower-court-decisions other-act-evidence prejudice probative-value rule-403 rule-404(b) rule-404b unfair-prejudice
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-other-act-evidence-under-rule-404(b)-is-substantially-outweighed-by-unfair-prejudice-under-rule-403
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Is it incumbent upon a trial court when determining whether the probative value of other-act evidence offered under Rule 404(b) is substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice under Rule 403 to consider a defendant’s concession to the element of intent for a crime, and also consider whether other credible evidence proves such intent before admitting inherently prejudicial other-act evidence? i
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-14
Reply of Bradley Hull submitted.
2024-12-14
Reply of petitioner Bradley Hull filed. (Distributed)
2024-12-06
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-10-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 6, 2024.
2024-10-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 6, 2024 to December 6, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-10-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 6, 2024.
2024-09-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 7, 2024 to November 6, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-08-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 7, 2024.
2024-08-27
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-08-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 5, 2024 to October 7, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2024)
Attorneys
Bradley Hull
Stephen R. Hormel — Hormel law Office, LLC, Petitioner
Stephen R. Hormel — Hormel law Office, LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent