Did the U.S. District courts' failure to allow relevant evidence into trial proceedings violate the Brady Rule of Evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, and the Due Process Clause of the 5th and 14th Amendments?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Oe (I) Did the U S District courts,failure te allow relevant evidence into trial proceeding viclate,Brady Rule of Evidence under aod, v Maryland 373 U.S.83 (see page four) : Bor Process Use iW Qwend. Also ight fo Nowe eomaul sory PYTOCESS . ; : {II) Did the District Courts abuse 4t's diseretion by submitting to the jury the question of objecttional reasonableness of Certanez an"objectively unreasonable" eleMent,into clearly established law prpag ef qualified immunity ane alysis2 Dgew Oth amend. & 14%" Amend: (111) Did Certanez action,violate Cruz's right to be free from harm het led,under the Eight Amendment of the United States Constitution. Did the action or the failure to act properly by Certanez violate Texas Safe Prison Act? : 8