Whether a sentencing court's failure to consider mitigating factors and individual circumstances violates a defendant's constitutional rights to individualized sentencing

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . Aa Cana Quilty Plea be valid, if tre deCerndawth is Nok aware. Dhak they are guilty of unt\| Ane senrkence is Pronounced 2 a. Coma aqui WY glean be valid, if at Sentence Ane Summon of whe relevant conduct 1S omit Prat Khe cous x€ndsS to ase Soc Ross iinle punishment ? 3, Can a sentence we valih \& an Ackendant . \e net com pe tent? Wity an LQ +o suggect claiws« 4A. Dees a. sentencing. cour® alouse iks discretion Dhen a delendarvks Wak Ae OK ra, Sacherg WarraKkh artrention are not metioned of constderedl ? S. DAW a deendoaurss Tights be Vielatedk at Bentercring AL abheic Powtly members are _ grewerted® Seow aa dressy tre cack on Aero 5 6. Dees inefGoline of assistance ef counsel Oacrant OO temand +o Le lower courk Dhow -tlece ig a Cosluee to address an moteriak issue otfenti ng a defedanks seorrerce ? T. AN an heRerdank we prejudiced i= ACA wm pro Se ark is dewied reguosted recocsdAsS Grom erevious counse| exten aller seelnivar He corcts assistante te compe 7 B. Com relertant conduct ale be conmaideredh corrieut an 4 WAwKess Aes timnowy 2 .