Whether a state's legislative apportionment scheme violates constitutional equal protection principles by potentially diluting minority voting power

No question identified. : Beso eseereo | = LAMENE E TE VES GonoeTUTIA CREATES A QiGuT wo Nahens Grass unten Artie 1, YEON 12, “GAD NEDITINE SMUTE TCCE ACTCIE LOT, SECON Z Hicrares we Taro Coons minsremial Sori w Nesoive ann CommmescaTs bode ls) ASSotATED wae AXE SoGmssion ¢& An AppCATICA Feo. nares Cones. TH Yes 6 A Casas Goilurs B Gmety wor rendervd Bue, phates . AllonsE ot ACCEPTARIE Oy tHe Jogawmo % ie cree ___ teen) TA ATE & THOS Reins Poer_d aE Commi Guods UNMEd TOTES ano SumpECT te ~£R_IncwHEd UNOEN FEOENA GUERDbUT in WE APPIYEETION Andion MSa@hesnen € Am a CONSTAO TOOL Gn TToTUTaR FEOENAl ML See law. Had Cor WL Save oF Teo le cally, orausink hy, AAO Whi aGlu Violate Ano/ar lbnene faninallyne las € we lend vamresr Prin REDRESS | OD ANT eee en ee