No. 24-5258
Lance James Talbot v. United States
Tags: 2nd-amendment bruen-standard civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-law due-process federal-firearms-law gun-rights second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation supreme-court
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(c)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, both facially and as applied to Mr. Talbot, in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(¢)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, both facially and as applied to Mr. Talbot, in light of New York State Rifle ¢> Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022)? i
Docket Entries
2024-12-06
Judgment Issued.
2024-11-04
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Rahimi</i>, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-09-24
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2024-08-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 7, 2024.
2024-08-27
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-08-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 6, 2024 to October 7, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 6, 2024)
Attorneys
Lance Talbot
John Carl Arceci — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
John Carl Arceci — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent