Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals improperly affirmed a district court judgment in a case involving federal sentencing guidelines and judicial discretion

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED --— -~ Hew con Q Viskich Court af the United Slates wiheud tne. Protec sonsbditten 40 Le and allow a case 4d Raceed and catleck Viving bees Coe case AO: 23L400 for the afPeal’ Cough as wel\ as dor Case NOLSP22-c4h~ 632OS-M, for the Nistrek Courk $356.60 AK SeSi00 Lee the alfeals CourthMou) Coutd Crvek untted Slates Dishet Judge Richard E.MYers TT fuled on Wis tavalid CamPlaing oS th lack ne ProPer Verve to be Cred at the. VeY least lel alone be fotes uPon in the Ssrm al a Judsemen Oram Lhe cherd Judge. on Ali 4 2423.37 How Could the. APPedls Coard or the united cfales for the Lourth Circork alSd ruie or The Same ChmPlofnt on aPPeal Cram dhe Undted stales DiZtitet coum for the eastern. drebricd ol vocth Carolia western Diursson. the District Conf Tnvalid \wdgement was offiimed by the Cadet Crew coon ab al eals in, MH Audgement which iS clSo Ta vald as well “The Qourth cut Cort rel ol ab heals Went Sa for as 4 155ce a mandate Yor the ow } Ssriotdit van Case that $5 Now being Pekitranad in the Unvked States SuPreme Court the deerdaads * ANIS Case are Scatt & Hartys, the Clerd A Coutt Clayton £ 39053 ay Wauds Con Was nat be a cn ab in dertest ok She Sutteme courl Level the clerk of court Sr the SuPre 2 . me copa afUMled Stales is a ddendant on this act nd . action, hak thas Tavalid thru ek XO the extent that This action Should Not have. leon ; a e orth Citcuit s Verve whch 1sSiied a Mandate i hs Spnissadl Toda ACCORDS do Ahe OrSkriek Cau £5 ' 8 . oat anor iro Sudgement, ‘, iow fn the jAstaade Case 36 the Plainti ths Constftutfna | Crohy ¢ 8 , File of Cwil Pricedure § 1406, Cy aif & Ndt Vi d/ate I (Fedaral Cour og Bishick Ta Kick Te Piles Cone Oskects = the District wrend division or Jottree tal Senne having Venue in thee Tytest f Jushice °braasker Sach a res ot if oe nthe sD in fe Ms Could have beeaA brush) “