Question not identified.

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) PU Stile purposely misrepresent and submit, mish sadislee dell " rate oF person evidence veh in verdict gach dobeadant 2 , 2) Did ArKansss Supreme Court err, toiling to tind Brady Vi Maryland $ a dueproces Wofation jn 5 present case 2 gi bople Violetron Cbkan Vv. Debuarefpe cr Miller vj Pate vialabign 3 os sot 3) Did Ste Aer, pubic defndat qe rele ) ap it's burden of piaof resulting feom t2lse evidence we and un corrected +0 obtam conviction ? A) Does méfiqation evidence axel. , 4 pb cam be roired any fine ded pas chasis fost 8) did sole en Paling 40 Lind maferil Bet of —— Ibentity “begaud, a reasonsbledoubt” fn curring gue in verdict 2 . 6) Dees judganenrt conform +o verdict tn fhis a’