No. 24-5272

Brian Michael Waterman v. Kansas

Lower Court: Kansas
Docketed: 2024-08-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: communication-restrictions constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review supreme-court-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Supreme Court should review a Kansas court's decision regarding defendant's constitutional rights and communication restrictions in a criminal case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; I. Cow stabs prosecufor’s do discovery receipts ow datendauts Aftor wer chiens case Fis containiva, Ab tov ney le kheys of Strakaqy, Sell uceimination , widenle, unde SW 22-3212 2 2. Does thy Sixth cmendmont raw fo Counsel and EIA bOU6, KSA b0-drecay Prowubit Athornnys From disc losing privase Communications ts Stau Prosecutors © 3. Wid He Kanses Supe Curis error im nok Having Ane Appallade Courks anSwer tssue fur iw prose Supplavartel Briel Ths star of Kansas used \wormahon fiom dafendants attovnay-cliguk confidantial case Ce ak trol 2

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-19
Waiver of right of respondent Kansas to respond filed.
2024-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2024)

Attorneys

Brian Michael Waterman
Brian Michael Waterman — Petitioner
Kansas
Anthony John PowellOffice of the Kansas Attorney General, Respondent