Whether the state's interpretation of a criminal statute violates constitutional due process and statutory interpretation principles

No question identified. : re STIONS PRESENTED a | pid Petitioner's APPLICATION £0R_CERTELCATE OF _APPEALABALLTY _ demonstrate that jurists of reason would find i debotalle whether the petition states co valid — — claim of the denial of a_constibutional tigel and Haak ee. —_jurists_of _rensom would Sind. id ee ee “Nevada state district couct sentenced __ Petitioner pucsuant to. a state lawl Hrot was > C1) Repealed statutes were stock down by the Nevada_Siipceme — Fran a ii dat a tn — — tye. State of Nevada lacked jurisaliction to prosecute state | ‘innes for_pucpases of Nevada Revised Statute (RS) 71.010 a | Sewete Bill 2 (SB7°), 8 lewd 3 _ 3 Should Petitioner ave been allowed to demonstrate ete o massive uncomstistional stocdutory clefect anda a jurisdictional issie upon uhich there is_a_majet conflict tin the published clocisions of the NSC amd the Nevada ——apitaes 7b siete Mesa atin cot cess decacles( i On