No. 24-5275
Terrell Jason Armstrong v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure federal-rule motion-for-new-trial newly-discovered-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct witness-recantation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court and Court of Appeals correctly denied a Motion for a New Trial based on a key witness's recantation of testimony
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the District Court and the Court of Appeals erred in denying , the Petitioner’s Motion for a New Trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, based on newly discovered evidence that a key | . prosecution witness recanted her testimony, asserting it was influenced by government pressure." ; ii .
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-12
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2024)
Attorneys
Terrell J. Armstrong
Terrell Jason Armstrong — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent