Rhoda Stahmann v. Christopher Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment FifthAmendment Securities Privacy
Whether the Director of the FBI violated his duties to enforce the law and protect civil rights under 18 U.S.C. sections 242 and 1001
Questions Presented *The Defendant Violated the Most Important US Supreme Law of the Land. Violation of His U.S Official Director of the FBI. Christopher Wray Violated his duties to Enforce Law under a Supervisory Role. Given the Direction for allowing Employee Misconduct Under 18 U.S.C s 242 an employee of Oath, of Authority “Collar of Law Division” that Enforces a Persons Civil Rights. Violation Christopher Ways Authority, allowed his employee to Violate his Job Duties and Commit a Crime 18 U.S.C s 1001 903. Survey of a white Collar Crime 32 AM Crim L Rev 137,323 346(1995) sec 101 O.obermairer and 12 morvillo, white Collar Crime Business and Regulator Offense s 10.02(1990 discussing sec 1001) 1341,1343 Provisions of Chap 9-42.001. Concealing false documents and statements at the Agency. : Fact Beyond Importance, violation Caused Deprivation of Life. Violation Caused false Imprisonment 11.404 (Ett V.Linn-Mar.. Sch Dis 656 N.W 2d IWOW. Violation Fact Beyond ; Importance, Violation 811.034 Statues Online Sunshine (1) Legislative Intent(A)(B), : ’ Definitions(a) Communicate(b) obtain (c ) property 3 service (d) scheme to Defraud & value(4)offenses(a) any person who engages in scheme to defraud and obtains Property : Guilty of Organized Fraud (D) Provisions Law a Criminal action or Civil Proceeding under this section may be Commenced at any time. Sec1983 violation 18 U.S.C Conspired in a Judicial statutory Scheme, violation all his Duties Held-in Office. Failed to Intervene, failed to report INegal use of the US Territory and Sectors done by Government and Law Officials violated his Official Role Acting for the U.S Director of the Fbl, upon National Security Due to the Violation was Security Fraud Done by Global Business, that use Capabilities of the US Intelligence. Dose this Violation Break Law under1983 right to the 14° Amendment to be enforced, by law of proscute and grant relief under rule 60(b)(1) ~ Rhoda Wray Case Numbers 23-cv-1724 U.S Eastern District Court & Case # 24-1079 Appeals Court 7* Circuit Chicago IL. *28 U.S.C 636c Fed rule Procedure 73(b) Clarify Discrepancies filling... App... (App(B) 23-cv1724(App(A) 24-1079 *Violation Judicial Scheme Special Provisions(B) Sec 8315(Cross ref sec 5525: App(A) 24-1079 *Violation Federalist 78 Presented Document filled with Violation of Statutory federalist,80 Pragmatist(Sec2-301 Code Civil Procedure(735 ILCS 512-301(West 1998)...App...(App (B) 23-cv-1724 App(A}24-1079 : *Violation Civil Right Act 6ID & 71D Characterization of the extent of official Immunity was not *Violation of Statutory Scheme under (issues State) Sec 1983 under US 149 11)20 US 150,US 149 s 20 11 Georgia Law, US 148 state rights Guaranteed by the 14° Amendment for purpose of Federal jurisdiction, the Doctrine History(Barney V City of New York,Suupra Which ruled otherwise although Question Has never been Over ruled.App. . *Violation 18 U.S.C 242 Deprivation of Life. App. (App(B)23-cv-1724 App(A}24-1079 *Violation Equal Rights Protections...App. *US Constitution is‘a Supreme Law of the Land -No Federal Law(Statue) Enacted by the U.S Congress Must be Followed by every state in the County is one of the requirements by code of Ethics &Provisions, violation working for the U.S (App(B)23-cv-1724 App(A) 24-1079 *Violation 18 U.S.C 245 (a) failed to uphold this Provisions of Law(Fact beyond App(A) 24-1079 ; (l)Questions presented *Violation 18 U.S.C 245 Federal Protected Activities (A)(1) following Impeachment Rule 607(B)..App.. (App. App(B)23-cv-1724 App(A)24-1079 *Violation 201 General Rule Art Il Rule App(A) 24-1079 *Violation (A) General Rule 609 Evidence of Conviction of a Crime(Doc 5) Clear Evidence a US Crime Committed Statutory Scheme Legislative Text(Socorro Ramires VS Hon Court of Appeal & Esther Gardy G.R No 93833 September 25,1995, 293 SCRA 590 (Cites true Intent) Commissioner of Customs VS-ESSO Standard Ester,IC 66 SCRA 113 (975 Sec6).App.App(B) 23-cv-1724 App(A)24-1079 : *Violation 18 U.S.C S