Question not identified.

No question identified. : (QUESTION ONE) Did District error in denying Petitioner Evidentiary Hearing to develop the facts validating his Const. claims: And thereafter committing compound error in denying defendant his right to a (COA) in which reasonable jurist would readily have agrred. , Petitioner has made prima face showing that Petitioners claims of Const.errors impact the reliability of his state. (QUESTION TWO) Did the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals error in denying Petitioner his rights to a (COA) to proceed on his Const. claims in which reasonable jurist would readily have agreed. Petitioner has made a prima facte showing that his claims of Const. errors impugn the reliability of his state convictions. Pg fi Yy :