Whether the Sixth Circuit erroneously denied relief for a prisoner's claim of retaliation and denial of access to courts through unlawful stripping of legal documents

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1) Whether the Sixth circuit made Clear error when it concluded that the District Court did not err or make mistake when it overruled the magistrate judges order that held that prison officials caused "actual injury" to plaintiff Rose ability to timely and fairly access the court when he was seeking meaningful federal and state post conviction relief by uniawfully stripping him of his legal documents, materiai(court documents) by way of retaiitory transfer for engaging in First Amenedment protected conduct? 2). Whether Jurist of Reason conclude or find it debatable that plaintiff Rose has presented a valid access to the court Claim with a non-frivolous underlying claim that would warrant relief? 3). Whether Jurist of Reason would conclude or find it debatable that the previous rule 60(b)(S) motion that : plaintiff Rose submitted to the District Court and the Sixth Circuit in an attempt to remedy the issues in this case were erroneously denied, especially considering that Mr. Rose was in compliance with controlling Sixth Circuit law? . Git