Whether the Supreme Court should review the classification of an immigrant's legal status and potential constitutional violations related to deportation proceedings

ESTionS PRESENTEN 4) £3 THE CuRE STA on) 14 ARITodals EQNERAL AGENC! ULU.d ) An VREOEN DEVELOP MEST AnswinrGa THE vst of MEochHe MALITVASA BY ALC THE RESIDES OF THE Ho vs IG U.N, OVECSEES A Viotation OF Tit€ El Qutel ACT cle OF AmMennmMenrt OF THE Constitution OF THE UNITED STATES? -)Ts THE PRoMsEn CrAnGe 0 F THE ScHEDLOLWS OF MaAeiToAWA From BE LQVATER AS ANLVG AS Letua As UEere To tHE CLASSIFYING OF N41 Tua On THe S4me LEVEL As AWAGouic STEMoNS A VALID (8RRELATION © fo : a )TS$ THE FENELAL GoYeenmeEntr's LONG Time PRoMULGAT ON, THA ARI TIANA 4 ATEWAY NLUG To HEtOIr ARDICTION A Ao 4 PoTHE Sis 2 4) witu THE RoPOSED RE CLASSIFICA Tron) OF MARIANA ALE THE CoURT RULINGS CITe BY THE DSM T covet TS Tt's NENG OF ml NIT AC: PETITION STi VA me : JIN AY DNITI AL FILING IN HE DISTRICT CVC, F Posen 18 iG uteer) Ave Tron. THe Hiest WAS“ Or) DUM Fou 4 CAT HES EXVision AcTiVE SHorTeg LULS AS PART OF OVR CHILDREDRS SeHoLASTIC WR cuLuMe QuéEs$TionS PRESENTED COnITIAIUEO i } aa |G.) WAS THE 1 céPrion oF THE “AEmowreuE _! OF MAGITUANO RACIALLY MNomVATER ? Vj Aree THE CFINIONS OF TIE UNITED STATES i SvmeemEe CoVAT SURBTET To CEvEeSAL ? _ |B.) IS Tet€_ United STATES SuPREmE Cove#»r 4 CoEQunr Be Kes OF THE FENECRC : Goveenmesst? { \ : +