1) When a state regulates a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, i.e a claim of constitutional entitlement to its postconviction review venue, does due process require that a defendant be allowed the opportunity to develop that claim?

2) When trial counsel proffers a defense of voluntary intoxication as defense against a first degree murder charge, is she ineffective when she fails to consult with an expert and provide an expert's testimony in support thereof?

When a state regulates a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, does due process require that a defendant be allowed the opportunity to develop that claim, and when trial counsel proffers a defense of voluntary intoxication, is she ineffective for failing to consult an expert?