Whether state and federal courts can make conflicting rulings when a defendant raises the exact same legal claim

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) ES TT RACTAL DTSCRTIMINATTON By THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS, WHEN A WHITE DEPENDANT RAISES A CLAIM OR ~rssueE AND THE COURTS TELLS HTM HE 2S CORRECT AND GRANTS THE REQUESTED RELIER BuT WHEN A BLACK DEFENDANT RATSES THE EXACT SAME | CLAIM OR “ISWE THE COURTS TELLS ++IM HE <S WRONG SRS AND REFUSES TO. CoRANT RELLEF 7 2) WHETER A CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS RIGHT De Jute AMENDMENT OF THE U.S. CONSTI UUTTON Ts VTOLATED WHEN THE STATE OF -GEORGTA TAKES THE EXAOT SAME STATUTORY LéAw AND APPITES Tr DIFFERENTLY TIN A _ WHITE DEFENDANTS CASE To His ADVANTAGE AND To Ac BLACK DEFENDANTS CASE 76 HIS DISADVANTAGE ° Questions 3) and 4 on next page 3) Dogs IT VIOLATE THE UNETED STATES i AE THE LAW” UNDER THE 14h AMENDMENT, “LF as BLACK DEFENDANT “1S MOT GIVEN THE SAME 3 TREATMENT OF LAW AS A WHITE DEFENDANT‘ 4) WHETHER THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS ) a tHe “Rreur” To MAKE ADVERSE RULINGS AGAINST BLACK DEFENDANTS, WHEN THE SAME COURTS MADE A FAVORABLE Ru TANG FOR A Wize DEFENDANT CONCERNTIIG THe EXACT SAME. LAW, EACTS, AMD TSSUE ?