Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine bar courts from adjudicating the religious qualifications of the leaders of a religious institution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Bethesda University is a Pentecostal institution that requires its Board members to share its religious faith and to act consistently with its Pentecostal beliefs. Consistent with these requirements, Bethesda removed purported Board members who did not share its religious beliefs. Nonetheless, a California state court adjudicated an intra-faith dispute over the Board members’ religious qualifications, allowing a non-Pentecostal religious faction to usurp control of the University. The question presented is: Does the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine bar courts from adjudicating the religious qualifications of the leaders of a religious institution?
2025-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-13
Reply of petitioners Bethesda University, et al. filed.
2025-01-13
Reply of Bethesda University, et al. submitted.
2024-12-30
Brief of respondents Seungje Cho, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-12-30
Brief of Seungje Cho, et al. in opposition submitted.
2024-12-12
Brief amicus curiae of The Coalition for Jewish Values filed.
2024-12-12
Brief amici curiae of Wagner Faith and Freedom Center, et al. filed.
2024-12-12
Brief amici curiae of Association of Christian Schools International, et al. filed.
2024-12-12
Brief amicus curiae of Coalition for Jewish Values filed.
2024-12-12
Brief amici curiae of Religious Colleges and Universities filed.
2024-12-12
Brief amici curiae of Wagner Faith and Freedom Center and Heartbeat International, Inc. filed.
2024-12-12
Brief amici curiae of Association of Christian Schools International, American Association of Christian Schools filed.
2024-12-12
Brief amicus curiae of Council on American-Islamic Relations filed.
2024-12-12
Brief amici curiae of Christian Legal Society, et al. filed.
2024-12-12
Brief amicus curiae of Foundation for Moral Law filed.
2024-12-12
Brief amici curiae of Religious Leaders filed.
2024-12-12
Amicus brief of Foundation for Moral Law submitted.
2024-12-12
Amicus brief of The Coalition for Jewish Values submitted.
2024-12-12
Amicus brief of Council on American-Islamic Relations submitted.
2024-12-05
Brief amicus curiae of National Religious Broadcasters filed.
2024-12-05
Brief amici curiae of Manhattan Institute, et al. filed.
2024-12-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 13, 2025.
2024-12-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 12, 2024 to January 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 12, 2024)
2024-09-26
Application (24A292) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 7, 2024.
2024-09-23
Application (24A292) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 8, 2024 to November 7, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.