No. 24-5307
Phillip Lee Kelley v. Kevin Stitt, et al.
IFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions jurisdictional-issue legal-petition procedural-review supreme-court writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; | THE BPPAS CO veT (lor#) LN POREEMENT C7 THE WD ISTRIT Covey STan= THAT THE PETITIONERS G Chawoy LSE.F-E 1793 Act ise TO CHAIEN GE THE FAT OR Deespean ©F AIS QwKmEMENT," wie lmson Dotson 544.5, 7A 78 (2005) HOWEVELS THE Cou WNT Ov TO SrATE 1 WHIKiN Sead 126 S.CT 1242, TAT “STATE PolsevERS Col CyaleNCl Thi. COmS TIO] CIALIS OF Spaz he Meo f2OCUNGES zal Acton ow OER &RBEZ Seb RIwl rv Tuy ue PREF Bet A £PE NO REAVIRGO PO In SxFAD SREK C2LIEFExoslo2 LY vMOE@ REDRLILWABMS FATES 78 Usch F 2254 ca _ W QuESTION (5 THE AVPEMWATE COoveT SF THE Sg
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2024)