Whether a warrantless search of a suspect's body during a medical procedure violates the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Uea a /iw entdoveeinent a apple > Le a search Wavracnt by phove, Wecall between Ae bse and the dudge why issues Vhe taevant must be vecovelkd Li's. Shi. F765. 7ats) Cd). Te tha catl o> not vecovthed, tt & may be A Bovul Oi pussible fre the debendlast Yo challenge the wevant ia pretvial Suppression Pvocech. or on appeal. Thus, absent adepuate vecorstvuction of an unvecoveled Seach Warvant OPPlMCetion, due process may dictate SupPressice oF the evidence SHermwaing Bron Yee S€arch, ’ . Fadh:s cast, OP Josiah GjePle applied Ay phone for a search wevvent that Would enable him ty dvaw Tewy M: Ph sons blood. The call was not vecovdled!, but OL er Gje¥ les wody Cam Captive ol his Side of dhe Covgersed/o, No one Aid Ln Wy f tag to and veconSbuct the Judge's side 08 thu conver sation fowell ove two yes. “ am oy qwdge ord o80ican Finally Convened to attempt a V econsty uch avs neds hedl ° “ Mamory of Fhu Call, MD then o tele phonic Seach Wwarvont opp Katies Goes bans trode Can hody Law Lodhoge Of Phe 088 res ode 08 We lonvey setious ad epuately vecoustvuck Pru verovd~ even whita the judge adits he cad amemby whad was sar? The civout Court Weld thet the Sted eadegucdy vetonstvuched the vecoud, The Cout . of Gppeals GEC vmed_