No. 24-5328
Aaron Christopher Lindsey v. United States
Tags: bruen-standard constitutional-challenge eighth-circuit felon-in-possession second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to a specific defendant under recent Second Amendment jurisprudence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, as the Eighth Circuit held, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (which prohibits any felon from possessing firearms) is invariably constitutional both facially and as applied to any defendant, no matter the case-specific circumstances? ii
Docket Entries
2024-12-06
Judgment Issued.
2024-11-04
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Rahimi</i>, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-09-26
Memorandum for the United States filed.
2024-09-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 16, 2024.
2024-09-12
Motion of United States of America for an extension of time submitted.
2024-09-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 16, 2024 to October 16, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2024)
Attorneys
Aaron Christopher Lindsey
Heather Rae Quick — Federal Public Defender Office - Iowa, Petitioner
Heather Rae Quick — Federal Public Defender Office - Iowa, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent