No. 24-5335

Valentino Cabral Darosa v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-08-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split expert-testimony federal-rules-of-evidence fingerprint-evidence good-faith-exception search-warrant
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourth Circuit's decision in United States v. Darosa conflicts with other Circuit Courts' precedents regarding the admissibility of fingerprint evidence and expert testimony

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW A WHETHER THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION IN UNITED STATES V. DAROSA IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE DECISIONS OF OTHER UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. i

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-20
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
Main Document
2024-08-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Valentino Darosa
Samuel Bayness Winthrop — Winthrop & Gaines Messick, PLLC, Petitioner