1. Whether this Court's holding in Strickland v. Washington ,
466 U.S. 668 (1984), requires reviewing courts to consider
the cumulative effect of counsel's errors in determining
prejudice.

2. Whether Petitioner was entitled to a certificate of appeal-
ability (OOA) on his Strickland claims where the district
court refused to consider the cumulative effect of counsel's
errors in determining prejudice and there is a sircuit split
on that specific issue.

3. Whether reviewing courts are required to weigh the factors
set forth in Delaware v. Van Arsdall , 475 U.S. 673, 686-87
(1986), to determine Strickland prejudice, where an attorney
elicits and fails to object to inadmissible hearsay
testimony and that testimony is the only evidence that
sufficiently corroborates the accomplice witness testimony.

4. Whether Petitioner was entitled to a COA on his Strickland
claims where the district court did not weigh the Van
Arsdall factors in determining prejudice for counsel's
eliciting of and failure to object to the above mentioned
hearsay testimony and at least one other circuit uses the
Van Arsdall factors in this same type of situation.

Whether reviewing courts must consider the cumulative effect of counsel's errors in determining Strickland prejudice and weigh Van Arsdall factors for ineffective assistance of counsel claims