No. 24-5350

Jay Sandon Cooper v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2024-08-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: bill-of-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fundamental-rights judicial-duty
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-12-13 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the judicial duty to identify and protect constitutional rights from Obergefell v. Hodges applies to state criminal cases and whether a conviction can stand when fundamental rights are violated

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : Whether the judicial duty to identify and protect constitutional rights described in Obergefell v. Hodges (a civil case) applies to State criminal cases? See . Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644, 663, 135 S. Ct. 2584, 2597-98, 192 L. Ed. 2D 609 ’ 2015). Whether the State court of appeals 2) had a duty to identify and protect defendant’s fundamental rights (enumerated in the Bill of Rights), whether objected to at trial or not, that the record showed were violated in the trial court; and 3) whether defendant’s conviction for a crime should stand when the State has failed to accord federal constitutionally guaranteed rights to defendant and the State court of appeals did not find that the deprivation of those rights were harmless beyond-areasonable doubt? : 2

Docket Entries

2024-12-16
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2024.
2024-11-15
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
2024-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 19, 2024)
2024-07-10
Application (24A16) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until August 15, 2024.
2024-07-05
Application (24A16) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 16, 2024 to August 15, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Jay S. Cooper
Jay Sandon Cooper — Petitioner