No. 24-5375
Michael Antrantrino Lee v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-law due-process retroactive-application sentencing-guidelines supreme-court-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does retroactive application of sentencing guidelines violate due process as construed by the Supreme Court?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : . | '), Is the Fourth Circus tS deciston / haldivs oe U.S. v. Norman, 93S F.3d 232, 239-34 CY cir, 2019) retoactvely applienble on Collateral review ? . 2). Does misagohcation of the fireBosker, /anndatry — guideles Violate Due prowess covcers articulated by the Supreme Court (41s Cowt) jw Johnson v. US.) (38 S.t# z2ss/ (201s)? / ' . ae i
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-09-06
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent