No. 24-5376
Donald Davis Gipson v. United States
Tags: constitutional-challenge criminal-statute federal-law firearm-possession interstate-commerce second-amendment
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
L Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) permits conviction for the possession
of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the
indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional?
I. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) comports with the Second
Amendment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) permits conviction for firearm possession based on interstate travel and whether such statute is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-09-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-09-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2024)
Attorneys
Donald Gipson
Adam Ryan Nicholson — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent