Whether the Eleventh Circuit abused its discretion in denying the appellant's motion for judgment and remanding the case due to procedural irregularities and alleged judicial misconduct

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals abused its discretion on , Denying the Appellant’s motion for entry of judgment by remanding the following related appeal USCA Case No. 11-22-13342 due to the appellees’ failure to file a response brief in this Court back to the District Court who fraudulently dismissed USDC Case No. after all defendants were properly served. 2. Whether or not the lower courts in both the Middle District of Florida and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals abused their discretion, and violated Supreme Court binding precedent in General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S._136 (1997) when they bypassed ruling on the Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts at (Document 11) of USDC Case No. as noticed in the Notice of Supplemental Authority at (Document 10) of related appeal 11-2213342 and (Document 24) of USDC Case No. and (Document 22) of this appeal, 11-23-12239 which conclusively proves that the ban had no legal precedence and in fact was not in accordance with any law. : 3. Whether USDC Case No. was improperly dismissed on Res Judicata grounds based on USDC Case No. being a Civil Rights Discrimination Complaint and not a Bivens Claim.