Whether statements made, in part, to provide evidence for a criminal prosecution can satisfy the hearsay exception in Federal Rule of Evidence 803(4) for statements made for medical treatment, or whether such a dual-purpose analysis conflicts with the rationale of Rule 803(4) and this Court's caselaw on ensuring the reliability of admitted evidence?

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether statements made, in part, to provide evidence for a criminal prosecution can satisfy the hearsay exception in Federal Rule of Evidence 803(4) for statements made for medical treatment, or whether such a dual-purpose analysis conflicts with the rationale of Rule 803(4) and this Court’s caselaw on ensuring the reliability of admitted evidence? pretix