No. 24-5395

Daniel Luke Meier v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-08-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process insurance-claim judicial-misconduct section-1983
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration SocialSecurity DueProcess Patent
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the lower courts and Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals commit fraud, tyranny, and oppression in a car accident injury claim by violating 42 U.S.C.§1983 and constitutional due process rights?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did all lower state courts and the District Court, and now the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, err in committing multiple outrageous and flagrantly criminal acts of fraud and fraud upon the court, tyranny, and oppression in so committing a literal overthrow of the U.S. government and committing acts of civil war and lawfare by repeatedly and illegally lying about the law and conspiring with Allstate Property Casualty Insurance Company in committing multiple acts of fraud in a prima facie car accident injury claim, and misrepresenting what constitutes the merits of the this case (s) under color of law in violation of 42 U.S.C.§1983 and the 5t and 14th Amendments to the Constitution? Did the District Court err in making outrageous, frivolous and fraudulent arguments under color of law and lie about the application of law for Allstate that Allstate did not make themselves, whereby committing criminal acts of bias, oppression, fraud upon the court, and arbitrarily blocking Mr. Meier’s right to due process and a full and fair opportunity to litigate? Did they in so doing deprive Mr. Meier of federally recognized equal protection rights under color of law under 42 U.S.C.§1983 and due process under the 5‘ and 14h Amendments to the constitution? : i Did the District Court fail to properly apply failure to deny rules for 42 U.S.C.§1983 criteria and again illegally block Mr. Meier’s federally protected right to jury trial, right to collect on a default legally docketed on court record, and rights to take discovery depositions whereby illegally discriminating against a pro se plaintiff in a Federal Court proceeding? ii No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DANIEL LUKE MEIER— PETITIONER VS. . ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CORP. — RESPONDENT ON : PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI The petitioner, Daniel Luke Meier, respectfully petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the unlawful judgment(s) and orders of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals April 24, 2024, Motion for Reconsideration filed May 10, 2024 and Denial of Reconsideration filed May 24, 2024. These rogue corrupt judges are destroying this country by ignoring citizens rights and the law demonstrating the lower courts are completely overthrown by criminals. . iii

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-11-14
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
2024-09-26
Waiver of right of respondent Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company to respond filed.
2024-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 26, 2024)

Attorneys

Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Kenneth P. WilliamsSegal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Respondent
Kenneth P. WilliamsSegal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney, Respondent
Daniel L. Meier
Daniel L. Meier — Petitioner
Daniel L. Meier — Petitioner