No. 24-5402

Craig Foote v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2024-08-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: counsel criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Was Petitioner denied the effective assistance of counsel? il

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-09
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 9, 2024.
2024-11-12
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-11-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2024 to December 9, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-10-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 18, 2024.
2024-10-10
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-10-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 17, 2024 to November 18, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-09-17
Response Requested. (Due October 17, 2024)
2024-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-09-06
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 26, 2024)

Attorneys

Craig Foote
Salvatore C. Adamo — Petitioner
Salvatore C. Adamo — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent