No. 24-5407
Darnell Anderson v. Aaron Fuson, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bivens-doctrine constitutional-claim deliberate-indifference eighth-amendment federal-corrections summary-judgment
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals correctly applied the Bivens doctrine in evaluating an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against a federal corrections officer
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred when it determined that petitioner's Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference against a federal corrections officer, presents a new context for Bivens purposes. 2. Whether the Court of Appeals erred when it affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgement to the federal . corrections officer,and dismissed the petitioner's complaint.
Docket Entries
2024-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2024)
2024-07-02
Application (24A3) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until August 22, 2024.
2024-06-20
Application (24A3) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 8, 2024 to August 22, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent