Whether a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment confrontation rights are violated when a court admits hearsay evidence through a surrogate witness in violation of the Confrontation Clause

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED This Court deemenl tt drudenr to “\eave for cwatlrer clay any aork Ao SPO UA O Comprelnensive delimrion ot “kesiuaowidl wher te determined ta Ceowlord fo wake o course adjustment on Conbvertotton Clause jarisprusenteln tue woke of is deciston cours across the vddtOn, oth stcte oppulase cing Faker crack, hove charted dikerent courses wm cdeterwulalayy wen iL ever, Ok -okCOU SakeOnkS suc aS exctheol Udlerantes are Legtmontal Lor Onluadtny Contvortatiion Clouse _ BeorerTons auayomkeed Loy Whe Stet Annenttacent: These. ANeving Coures oe tneorsiter | ak laett, andl, le general coUNErlWe ko {ee generdl wuckertianadlng Ged tuts Court's COdLG) LK ‘\eotng, Yue venwadtion of ouk-olCoMnt srodennends ‘La Yue law of euithevce would veuder the Cortromacton Qos MuLarress fo Presank gi M2 MO Rogvonk \aqurisctonta| grankgess -* WWOW Is Yecisely wWhuy Lis fourt ts urged to Wein axel Settle Ke Aispale O47 CO a crlaulea) defendant ‘re convitkedt on Ya atk ofcourt atausokton ob a viene Cesena, cotkebendant determined lay the tee court to Ye on exorted udterance ?