No. 24-5414
Cleveland J. Enmon v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-conviction eleventh-circuit jury-instructions medical-prescription ruan-standard standard-of-review
Latest Conference:
2024-12-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit erroneously applied an objective standard in jury instructions for a physician's prescription case in light of the Ruan v. United States ruling
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , I. Whether the Eleventh Circuit erroneously refused to apply _ the Ruan v. United States ruling to Dr. Cleveland Enmon's case. : : ; II. Whether the Ruan v. United States ruling is retroactive to wrongfully : convicted prescribing physicians. : : III. Whether the importation of an Objective Standard into the jury “+ instructions is harmful error.
Docket Entries
2024-12-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-11-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-10-15
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-09-06
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent