Whether the District Court and Appeals Court committed reversible error and abuse of discretion in a pro se civil rights case involving alleged statutory violations and potential wrongful foreclosure

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the District Court and Appeals Court committed reversible error, abuse of discretion, and error as a matter of law and did not enforce the statutes and enforce the statutes that were enacted by congress the were violated by Defendant/Appellee because Plaintiff/Appellant is pro se, black, in a protected class and indigent? ; Is Defendant/Appellee barred from contesting on appeal the facts thus , established by Defendant/Appellee willful default. Did Plaintiff/Appellant case receive the judicial attention which Article III of the Constitution requires? —. The record proves Defendant/Appellee “Chase” business records were not attached to the Affidavit of Dorothy A. Washington. Can Defendant/Appellee be granted Summary Judgement? : The District Court stated, Plaintiff/Appellant Attempted Wrongful Foreclosure may proceed. See Doc. 171 Pages 10 -14 of 28, C Attempted Wrongful Foreclosure, Page 14, para 5-6, “All told, the allegations in the amended complaint are sufficient to state a claim for attempted wrongful foreclosure, in Case Can the case be dismissed and not proceed to trial on damages? The record proves that Managing Partner, Attorney William O. Tate is a debt collection and mostly works from home and travels a lot and do not have no meaningful involvement in the cases for his client, “Chase”, (applying the meaningful attorney involvement doctrine. Can a debt collector that do not have no meaningful attorney involvement litigate a case in Federal Court? lf Genuine issues of material fact remained which barred a grant of summary Judgment in favor of Defendant/Appellee, can the Court dismiss the Case?