Whether the Ninth and Fourth Circuits apply different standards in evaluating qualified immunity for law enforcement officers' use of force claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED * WHETHER THERE FS A “Cieeurt Selir"AmonG THE TEentTH CIRCUIT AND FovetTH CIRCUIT Applying; BieF ERENT Rules To WHAT SHoolh BE THE SAME LAw DN Zeaaess TO ApplyinG Appeal waivers / cellareral ATT ACS e wreTHEeR THE Tent CiaeuItT AND DisteicT COVET oF wyomMinG Caroneously Euco“eced PeririowER> Collateral Arad WAIVER THAT clearly ResuttS In A Complete “ Mis CARRIAGE weretTHee THE eT CleCUYT AWD DISTRICT cover OF meyer Eerone ously * Proce DuRally DEFAULTED" PETITION FES claim Fos ies Becavee (snires sraveg Ve TA YIM) ce 28 USS 2255 & BEC Revier une > was wot Kernil Avarlagl] 4™ vee py2 5. ek, ZOls, Zor! a ” ; ” wernee “ATTEMPTED RoBBERY syvelvine, Controlled subraners 18 USC H 2NF (6) aLieies As A GRIME oF VIOLENCE SEN Li@tit of (uniter stares v wear 4 is Pa 42 5 ck Ole) 202k (2227)) UnDER S gy (c) ELEMENTS CLAUSE re ° LWHEetTHEeR THE TENTH Giacuir ABUSED» Irs Disenervos For DEWIING * i = ~ Cok’ vareg 22 usc, § 1254, 28US6. F 2253 Ww AGrdance wir .U-S-A NS Hahn. .