Joshual Lamar Davis v. Ian Maxfield, et al.
Question not identified.
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (When Summons was Serwed ab Velendants See Dhes Versonal Vvowledge of here Sob Wiiere Delendents | ‘learned “The ata led a Cw SME Sommening Them ts (ot Cnsthite Service of Pjoce95 t) Dyes Aepenvance ot Delerdayyl-s in Coord tecttly Knewledre of Hie Sobstance J Complaint srcally 9 hem and butltute Sevice 4) Ts Fence ictect where Delendanls werent ha wwolleed omy \Whormnalile i Service. Preyied reer ae Qeblic petice 15 lex Lec), Les abival Petive Demshrabed By Veferuts Knowledge o€ So Constitute Service to) Des The Delendlnds Concluslong away tert +udThey hadi reseved @ fy Sgeed a receph br giver aut Zab or geveflance of Senic on Heir ALAC Cenglitite inSufAcientService of Pinces5 when ypwe of Nose Slovdaralf ave fede Under Lex loc) ,aual Delentanfs had Perscng/| bons Wveqler Sewice on Sheriffs Gee Prope y when ole 6 Vr and Violates Weve Coumilfed waley Coley of lies 8) wetter Satvres Moucating the phe Lv Fervicg of Process be Conscevued I berally apply ere ee IEE