Whether a criminal defendant's right to effective assistance of counsel is violated by a post-conviction delay that impedes access to legal remedies and potentially prejudices the defendant's ability to challenge their conviction

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : | . TE a defendant has elected to ex excise. his Aight fo procetel fro SE, Alhe.¥ ye fun Yary OA tasvoluntany ; does he Mil Haw Aral 4 Const YoY sonra l Au oky to the Eltedhve assistance ot sand by CoumseLl ? | aA. Does the Due Process And E goal Prolection Clauses protect agarars¥ exorh: Vand delay IN ~ post Convictions proceedings tou ined g ta : . defend ans anol should tHe Speedy Thal Clause also he im plenenYed ? ; . . ee Wot : . 3 oF 184