No. 24-5442

Philander Philippeaux v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2024-09-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: district-court due-process fifth-amendment judicial-delay mandamus motion-pending
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-10-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a federal district court judge's prolonged delay in ruling on pending motions constitutes a violation of procedural due process

Question Presented (from Petition)

ISSUE PRESENTED ON EXTRAORDINARY WRIT ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION TO COMPEL THE DISTRICT COURT TO ISSUE A "LEGAL ORDER" (GRANTING OR DENYING) PETITIONER'S PENDING MOTIONS ON THE MERIT OF THE ISSUE PRESENTED IN FRONT OF THE DISITRICT COURT. 1If Petitioner's motion has been pending on the District Court Docket for over Four (4) years, since August 17, 2020, does judge Ronnie Abrams (Southern District of New York) allow to hold judgment indefinitely? 2Although Petitioner has no other adequate means to attain the relief desired, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals refuses to compel judge Ronnie Abrams to issue judgment. "Procedural Due Process Violation, Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.” . The United States Supreme Court's supervisory power is the only and last resort. ( . ee . . β€œte

Docket Entries

2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-12
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-09-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2024)

Attorneys

Philander Philippeaux
Philander Philippeaux — Petitioner
Philander Philippeaux — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent