No. 24-5453
Thelonious Wayne Kirby v. United States
IFP
Tags: commerce-clause constitutional-law federal-firearms-regulation felony-possession second-amendment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment FourthAmendment Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment FourthAmendment Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-11-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) facially violates the Second Amendment and exceeds Congress's Commerce Clause power
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) facially violates the Second Amendment. 2. Whether 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) exceeds Congress’s Commerce Clause power. (D
Docket Entries
2024-12-06
Judgment Issued.
2024-11-04
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Rahimi</i>, 602 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-09-26
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2024-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2024)
Attorneys
Thelonious Wayne Kirby
Matthew D. Cavender — Office of the Federal Defender (MDFL), Petitioner
Matthew D. Cavender — Office of the Federal Defender (MDFL), Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent