Whether a district court may rely on 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release despite their omission from 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)

QUESTION PRESENTED The supervised-release statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), lists factors from 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for a court to consider when sentencing a person for violating a supervised-release condition. In that list, Congress omitted the factors set forth in section 3553(a)(2)(A)—the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, and provide just punishment for the offense. The question presented is: Even though Congress excluded section 3553(a)(2)(A) from section 3583(e)’s list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, may a district court rely on the section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release? Five circuit courts of appeals, including the panel order below, have concluded that district courts may rely on the section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors. Four circuit courts of appeals have concluded that they may not. [The same question is presented in Esteras et al. v. United States, No. 23-7483. In that case, petitioners filed a petition for a writ of certiorari on May 15, 2024. On May 28, 2024, the Court requested a response, which is due on August 30, 2024.] i