Whether lower courts can delay and deny habeas corpus access while maintaining constitutional adherence to privilege guarantees

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Can lower courts, delay and deny access to Habeas Corpus, and maintain Constitutional adherence to the privilege guarantee? 2) Can a District court proceed with a “case” against a person, without an affidavit supported complaint being filed. 3) Can a lower court hold Article III jurisdiction, over non evidenced ‘controlled substances’? 4) Is a Grand Jury premeditated, for the purposes of protecting public citizens right under the Constitution, as outlined in Rule 6(a)’s opening line? 5) Is a court allowed to transcend the speedy trial rights provisions of law, by 7 years? 6) If public interests were the pursuit of the United States, why is there NO restitution in Petitioner’s case? Why no tax evasion charges? Why no actual denotation of community damages? 7) Most significantly, can the United States force a defendant into a second testing of criminal -“. accusations, without violating the double jeopardy provisions of the US Constitution? “ 8) Did the 2" Circuit commit Constitutional — and statutory — error, when VACATING and ; remanding without prejudice, a person who was denied his right to speedy and fair trial?