Do the government's repeated First and Fourteenth Amendment violations, including police interference and intimidation, constitute actionable constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?

QUESTION PRESENTED Do the government’s repeated violations of the First and Fourteenth Amendments, as demonstrated by informal pressure from police officers such as, altering the Petitioner's report about a high-tech transnational terrorist group to portray it as unhinged, concealing the crime, sharing inaccurate reports with external parties, and using threats and intimidation to discourage reporting of actionable constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § . 1983? . Whether the failure of police, attorneys, and court officials to act upon knowledge of known interference by a high-tech transnational terrorist group undermines the integrity of the judicial process and constitutes violations of Due Process, and what remedies are available to parties harmed by such inaction? Did the Fifth Circuit and the district court fail to adequately consider the inculpatory evidence, including videos and audio recordings, as well as a successful Internal Affairs investigation that substantiated the practices and procedures which violated the Petitioner's constitutional rights as established by the Supreme Court? Did the lower courts misinterpret the requirements for ; establishing a direct causal connection between the . alleged actions of the police officers and the claimed constitutional violations? 8