No. 24-5464

Jeromy Schiedenhelm v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-09-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency ineffective-assistance trial-counsel
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-10-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Texas counsel fails to adequately challenge insufficient evidence and provide ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of U.S. Constitutional rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QUESTIONS To BE PRESENTED. | QUESTION ONE, ~ TF TRIAL COUNSEL FALLS To, AND REFUSES A DEFENDANTS REPEATED DEMANDS TO FILE A MOTION Yo SUPPRESS AND MAKE THE PROPER, FOURTY AMENDMENT CLAZIMS WIEN AN ALARMING AMOUNT OF Foun AMENDMENT SSUES CLEARLY EXIST, IS TRAT INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE , UNDER, STRECALANDD AND A VIOLATION OF U.S.CONST. AMEND.’S WIA Ky ? " QUESTION Two!” LF TREAL COUNSEL FALLS TO MOVE FoR JOA WEN THE STATES EVIDENCE OW A KEM ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE TS TNSUFFL CTLEN) To PROVE GUILT, AND COUNSEL 3S NOT AWARE OF NOR RESEARCHES, AND THEREFORE FALLS To APPRAISE TRE TATAL COURT OF A RELEVANT LAW TRAY WOULD WAVE SUPPORTED A JOA ARGUMENT AS To THE OFFENSE IN QUESTION , TS TAT TLNEFFECTLVE UNDER STIL CKLAND AND A VIOLATION OF U.S. CONST AWERD.’S Waxy?” QUESTION THREES” LY TRIAL COUNSEL MOVES Fol JON ON AN OFFENSE, BUT FALLS TO ARGUE THAT THE STATES EVIDENCE ON A KEK ELEMENT OF TRAE OFFENSE WAS TNSUFFICTENT TO PROVE GUTLT, LS TAA INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER STRECALAND AND A VIOLATION OF U.S. CONST. AMENDS WI & XW 2” QUEST TON FOUN. “LY TRTAL COUNSEL FAILS TO OBJECT To * PURE OPINION’ TESTIMONY THAT CLEARLY TAVADES TRE PROVINCE OF THE JURY, TS TRAY INEFFECTIVE UNDER STRIGQLAND AWD A VIOLATION OF U5. CONSTT AMENDS wren?” vi CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PETSONS, AND Schiedenhelen , veromy Ss vs. Secretory Flo. Dee oF Corr. eX ol, No-t The FeNiowsnn, persone nove on interest in ne ovtkcome of Sinis Nooea\ : Bere age) Wends Wd . , Former Judes HEY DCL, Florido.} : Braddock, Crow AR Nos. ston} Puatic DeFender’, . Borden, Georng DE., Novistony PUgic Defender, AopeMode Divioion Coupes), Bepn P., Assiaror Stoke Attorney, a . Corrente, Corman F., Noschons A¥Sorner Generp\', Dozier | Jomes, Kasotony Desgona\ Counse’, no Exsnouge , Ere J, dudge , FiF¥n DCA, Florida, Evander; heres) L, Judye HP DA, Floride) . Giodsen, Bill, Elected Slobe Nerney BR Judicial Ciecuth, Florida Grovel, Sean hy Assioront Pubic DeFender , Rapellake Division) Groves, Mike, Elecked Pookie DeFenier, iin Judicial Ciccurk, Flor do Heidl, Wesley A, Former Assstan\ KYrorney Generol’, Rowerd , Ta cnord A. ) Ciecrk Court Jude 1 EN n Judiccad Creu) Lolbaron. , Jorog , Florida Sugreme Courk Justice 5 oo . Luck, Reberk J., Former Florida. Sugrene Cour} Jodice’, * Lamberk, Brian D., One® Judge BE DCH Florida’, . Lowsen Man, Florida Svereme Courh Jus ce) Mc Guinan, Rebecca B., Stoke Morne, General, Comino Ryyeas) Mekts, So. A., Nos. gront S\oke Reorney’ : a : Mekz, MokVnew, Elecked Palic Defender, Severity Judicial Crcevi}, Floridety Moods), Asn =| B., Elecked Nerney Creal, Freride | Poles , Ricard A, Rassskony Morne, Genera _ Como Ngpeads, ; Po\o\on, Bid, Florida Supreme coud Juslice)) Doaworyr , Whonas DB. Senior Judge EFYh D-CA, | Frorida.’, ; Wood 7 Lulher ©, ) Nesretant Pudlic beFender 5 Wallis, Rond F. , Judag , Vn DCA, Vrorido., Xeemon, Mok, Cc co Covet Judas RF dedicial Ge wr, Florida. Jheyoeey, . A BZ Sevicdeanedm Jesoony S. JAGLE OF CONTENTS QUESTIONS TOBE PRESENTED rte ee cere etreeeres ep srettene “CERTEELCATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS 220+ conser es eee ee ee ee roll TADLE OF CONTENT ®t te tote sete cee cee tecenetee erat ee cee cee cece iV PRELEMENARY STATEMENT ©: 2520022 os eect terre eee ete tee eee TADLE OF CIVATIONS + <6 one ee eee eee ete en ee meee eee ae va CONSTZYUS TONAL AND STATUTORY PROVESIONS-. 6 ees eee ee ones vii OPINTONS BELOW: + 2 oe nee eee nee ee ne tn ere cee nee ee eee eee WA JUNE SDICT ION: *eee ere tee cette eterna re tet enn ene e nee AX STAVEMEN OF CASE AND FACTS: ttre nat rte eet ete e tee een eee d QUESTION ONES (See eres tee a tenet ee te ce ee ee eee MA REASON To GRANT CERVEONARE: tts co reere rc terse rts eee cree ee Mh QLESTION Two: (Seer co et ee teen ne cere meee ee AB TREASON to Grant CERTLORARAL tr er tet ete te ese w ec enewes 18 QUESTION THREE: (See Qin irre tttc certs sete reese 20. REASON To GIANT CERTEOMARL! ttt tet tee sc tees ne ceseee eee 20 QUESTION FOUR: (Seer estes cer cee eer eet meee ne cere e

Docket Entries

2024-10-21
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
2024-10-02
Waiver of right of respondent Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. to respond filed.
2024-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 7, 2024)
2024-05-24
Application (23A1053) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until July 19, 2024.
2024-05-13
Application (23A1053) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 19, 2024 to August 18, 2024, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Jeromy Schiedenhelm
Jeromy Schiedenhelm — Petitioner
Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Richard Alexander Pallas Jr.State of Florida Office of the Attorney General, Respondent