No. 24-5472
IFP
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-11-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit err by dismissing Thomas' Jayaton-Kerry's Writ of Mandamus as frivolous and denying due process?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Did the Ninth Circuit err by dismissing Thomas: Jayaton-Kerry’s Writ of Mandamus because of their stated frivolous filing due and related In Forma Pauperis, thereby denying Thomas due process and the opportunity to the full benefit of the court and the fulfillment of the judicial machinery?
Docket Entries
2024-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-10-28
Reply of petitioner Thomas Jayaton-Kerry filed.
2024-10-17
Brief of respondents Jim Cooper, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-09-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 6, 2024
2024-09-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 7, 2024 to November 6, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-08-29
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 7, 2024)
Attorneys
Jim Cooper and Angel Delgadillo
John R. Whitefleet — Porter Scott, Respondent
John R. Whitefleet — Porter Scott, Respondent
John Robert Whitefleet — Porter Scott, Respondent
John Robert Whitefleet — Porter Scott, Respondent